Egyptian Mummy is back in Action

As US has successfully exported its economic problem to other countries, it is now coming back to it
in politically. It seems that the first of the countries that are feeling the heat of the inflation are its key allies, like Egypt. Now in many of the countries inflation is spilling into political turmoil, so intensive that even 30-40 year old regimes are threatened.

Back in India, We are having the most cynical of political situations. Rahul Gandhi, member of the political family in power, is calling on people to change the System instead of keep on shouting..

Mubarak, don't call Obama on how to manage the situation.. Call Rahul Gandhi for some real advise..

Emerging economies caught in inflation dilemma

Analysis : Emerging economies, seen as the big hope for global growth this year, are caught in a tricky dilemma: let inflation rip and hurt stability or raise rates and risk stalling their economies.

Ladies and Gentleman, this is the way through which America has once again escaped its problems. Now it has outsourced the Inflation threat to other countries and is cooling off happily as usual.

When will Indians and Chinese stand up to this?

Inflation as a ploy : No tax worse than inflation: Chidambaram

Read the comment by Chidambaram about Inflation:
Concerned over high inflation, Union Home Minister P Chidamabaram on Wednesday expressed doubt on whether the government had all instruments to check price rise. " inflation is high, food inflation is very high... we are not sure whether we have all the tools in hands to control food inflation," Chidambaram said at a function organised by Skoch consultancy.


I think that Congress is using Inflation as a ploy to divert public attention from 2G scam. I should concede that this ploy has worked wonderfully. Is the public punished for talking too much?

WikiLeaks' Most Terrifying Revelation: Just How Much US Government Lies to its own citizens

Try as I may I can not escape the sound of suffering. Perhaps as an old man I will accept suffering with insouciance. But not now; men in their prime, if they have convictions are tasked to act on them."

-- Julian Assange, 2007 blog entry

Do you believe that it is in Americans' interest to allow a small group of U.S. leaders to unilaterally murder, maim, imprison and/or torture anyone they choose anywhere in the world, without the knowledge let alone oversight of their citizens or the international community? And, despite their proven record of failure to protect America -- from Indochina to Iran to Iraq -- do you believe they should be permitted to clandestinely expand their war-making without informed public debate? If so, you are betraying the principles upon which America was founded, endangering your nation, and displaying a distinctly "unamerican" subservience to unaccountable authority. But if you oppose autocratic power, you are called to support Wikileaks and others trying to limit U.S. Executive Branch mass murder abroad and failure to protect Americans at home.

These two issues became officially linked for the first time when former U.S. Afghan commander General Stanley McChrystal explicitly stated that the murder of civilians increases rather than decreases the numbers of those committed to killing Americans, and actually implemented policies -- since reversed by General Petraeus -- to reduce U.S. murder of civilians. McChrystal said that “for every innocent person you kill, you create 10 new enemies." By so doing he made it clear that killing civilians is not only a moral and war crimes issue, but -- in today's interdependent world -- also threatens U.S. national security.

Source : Alternet.org